Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 13 |
| 2019-04-10 | 2023-04-04 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black,Deep blue and Red | Interstellar Black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 166.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a global score of 83.4, which is better than Samsung Galaxy A20's 74.7 score. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro is a noticeably newer phone than Samsung Galaxy A20, although it's a little thicker and heavier. Both phones we compare here come with Android operating system, but Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a newer 13 version while Samsung Galaxy A20 has Android 11 version.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a lot better looking display than Galaxy A20, because it has a much higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, more pixels per inch of screen and a little larger display. Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A20, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 224 GB more internal memory.
Galaxy A20 features an extremely better processor than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 cores. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a little longer battery performance than Galaxy A20, because it has a 15 percent greater battery size. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro takes a lot better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A20, because it has a larger aperture for better low light photos and video, a camera with much more mega pixels, a lot larger back-facing camera sensor shooting much better quality pictures and videos and a lot better video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.