Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-04-10 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black,Deep blue and Red | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 166.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.02 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a general score of 86.3, which is much better than the Galaxy A20's general score of 74.7. Motorola Edge 50 Pro's body is newer than the Galaxy A20's, but it is a little bit thicker and a little heavier. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a more recent 14 version while Galaxy A20 has Android 11 version.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with an incredibly better display than Galaxy A20, because it has a higher screen pixels density, a quite bigger screen and a much better resolution of 1080 x 2400. The Samsung Galaxy A20 features a lot better performance than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has less RAM, they both have 8 cores.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a very superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A20, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a much better camera than Galaxy A20, because it has a lot better (4K) video definition, a lot larger camera aperture to take better photos in poorly lited environments, a back-facing camera with a lot higher resolution and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro has just a bit longer battery duration than Galaxy A20, because it has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.