Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-04-10 | 2020-07-08 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Black,Deep blue and Red | Surfing blue |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| $ 166.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LCD |
| 268 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Moto G 5G Plus is better than Galaxy A20, getting a global score of 82.6 against 74.7. The Moto G 5G Plus is a newer phone than the Galaxy A20, although it's heavier and somewhat thicker. The Moto G 5G Plus has a little bit better performance than Galaxy A20, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Moto G 5G Plus also has 1 GB more RAM memory.
The Motorola Moto G 5G Plus features a sharper display than Galaxy A20, because it has a lot better 1080 x 2520px resolution, a way higher pixels quantity per display inch and a little larger screen. The Moto G 5G Plus takes much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy A20, because it has a lot better resolution back camera, a larger camera aperture to capture better low light captures and videos, a way bigger sensor providing a way better image quality and a lot higher (4K) video definition.
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus features a much bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy A20, because it has 64 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. Moto G 5G Plus counts with improved battery duration than Galaxy A20, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.