Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-04-10 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black,Deep blue and Red | Smoke black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| $ 166.00 | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 268 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Moto G Power has a score of 76.1, which is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A20's global score of 74.7. Even though the Moto G Power is newer than the Samsung Galaxy A20, it is somewhat thicker and heavier. These phones include the same Android 11 OS, so you shouldn't see any differences regarding operating system features.
The Motorola Moto G Power has a much better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A20, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Motorola Moto G Power also has a greater quantity of pixels per display inch and a much higher 1080 x 2300 pixels resolution. The Motorola Moto G Power counts with a bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A20, and although they both have a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 512 GB, the Motorola Moto G Power also has 64 GB internal memory.
Moto G Power features a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A20, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Moto G Power also has a greater amount of RAM. The Motorola Moto G Power has longer battery duration than Galaxy A20, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh. The Moto G Power features a better camera than Samsung Galaxy A20, because it has a much higher (4K) video definition, a bigger camera aperture for better images in poorly lited environments, a larger camera sensor which offers a higher image and video quality and a more mega pixels back camera.
The Moto G Power not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also cheaper than the Galaxy A20.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.