Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2019-04-10 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black,Deep blue and Red | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Plastic | -- |
| $ 166.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Moto Z Force is slightly better than Galaxy A20, having a 75.8 score against 74.7. Both of these phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the Moto Z Force has the newer 7.0 Nougat version and Galaxy A20 has Android 11 version. Despite of the fact that the Moto Z Force is much older than the Galaxy A20, it's body is a bit lighter and a little thinner.
Moto Z Force counts with a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A20, because although it has 4 less processing cores , it also counts with more RAM memory. The Motorola Moto Z Force features a brighter display than Galaxy A20, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a way higher quantity of pixels per screen inch and a much better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution.
Moto Z Force counts with a superior camera than Galaxy A20, because it has a bigger diafragm aperture, a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a lot better resolution camera. The Moto Z Force has a much better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A20, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1,95 TB and 64 GB internal storage.
The Samsung Galaxy A20 has just a little better battery lifetime than Moto Z Force, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Although Motorola Moto Z Force is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Galaxy A20, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Galaxy A20. If you are trying to save some money, you can get the Galaxy A20, letting go a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.