Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-04-10 | 2017-08-10 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black,Deep blue and Red | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| $ 166.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition is a little bit better than Galaxy A20, having a 77.4 score against 74.7. Even though the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition is older than Galaxy A20, it's design is a lot thinner and lighter. Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a way better display than Samsung Galaxy A20, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a way better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a much greater screen pixel density.
The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition features a much greater storage for apps and games than Galaxy A20, because it has 64 GB internal memory capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition has a little faster CPU than Galaxy A20, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Moto Z2 Force Edition features a slightly better camera than Galaxy A20, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture and a less mega-pixels resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a way higher (4K) video quality. Samsung Galaxy A20 has a much better battery lifetime than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 2730mAh.
Although Moto Z2 Force Edition is a better device, it costs a lot more than Galaxy A20, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Galaxy A20. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy Moto Z2 Force Edition, but if you don't you can save some dollars and buy the Galaxy A20, giving up a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.