Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-04-10 | 2017-06-29 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Black,Deep blue and Red | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| Plastic | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 166.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Moto Z2 Play is just a bit better than the Galaxy A20, getting a 77.4 score against 74.7. Moto Z2 Play's design is a lot thinner and somewhat lighter than the Galaxy A20, although it was released just a bit more than a year before. The Motorola Moto Z2 Play has a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy A20, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola Moto Z2 Play also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Moto Z2 Play features a brighter screen than Galaxy A20, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per screen inch and a better resolution of 1080 x 1920px. Motorola Moto Z2 Play has a little bit better camera than Galaxy A20, because although it has a worse 12 megapixels resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a much higher video quality and a larger camera aperture for better photography in poorly lited environments.
The Moto Z2 Play features much more storage to install games and applications than Galaxy A20, because it has 64 GB internal storage capacity and a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy A20 has better battery life than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
The Motorola Moto Z2 Play costs more than Samsung Galaxy A20, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.