Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2019-04-10 | 2018-08-16 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black,Deep blue and Red | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 166.00 | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Moto Z3 has a global score of 77.6, which is a bit better than the Galaxy A20's 74.7 overall score. The Moto Z3 body is somewhat thinner and a little lighter than the Galaxy A20, even though both were only released with a couple months difference. Both devices in this comparison work with Android operating system, but the Moto Z3 has a more recent 9.0 Pie version while Galaxy A20 has Android 11 version, so it provides you some extra features and performance tweaks.
Motorola Moto Z3 has a bit more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy A20, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola Moto Z3 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Moto Z3 counts with a sharper screen than Galaxy A20, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the display and a much better resolution of 1080 x 2160 pixels.
Moto Z3 features a very superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A20, because it has 64 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB. Motorola Moto Z3 features just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A20, because although it has a tinier aperture and a less mega-pixels back camera, it also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 video resolution and a larger back camera sensor.
The Galaxy A20 features greater battery duration than Moto Z3, because it has a 33% more battery capacity.
Although Moto Z3 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Galaxy A20, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Galaxy A20. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get Galaxy A20, letting go a couple features and specs, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.