Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 76.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-04-10 | 2018-06-29 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black,Deep blue and Red | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 166.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.02 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto Z3 Play has an overall score of 76.3, which is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A20's score of 74.7. Even though Motorola Moto Z3 Play is older than the Samsung Galaxy A20, it's construction is a little bit lighter and somewhat thinner. The Samsung Galaxy A20 and the Moto Z3 Play both have quite similar processing units, and although the Moto Z3 Play has a larger amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores.
Moto Z3 Play features a better screen than Galaxy A20, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher display pixel density and a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2160 pixels. The Motorola Moto Z3 Play has a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A20, because although it has a back-facing camera with less MP resolution, it also counts with a larger sensor capturing better quality photographs, a bigger diafragm aperture for better images in poorly lited environments and a lot higher (4K) video resolution.
The Moto Z3 Play counts with a much better memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy A20, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB and 32 GB more internal memory capacity. The Galaxy A20 counts with superior battery performance than Moto Z3 Play, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
Although Motorola Moto Z3 Play is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Samsung Galaxy A20, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Samsung Galaxy A20. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy A20, giving up a few features and specs, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.