Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-04-10 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Black,Deep blue and Red | Oxford blue |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| $ 166.00 | $ 398.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LCD |
| 268 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One 5G has a general score of 84.6, which is much better than the Galaxy A20's 74.7 score. Even though Motorola One 5G is newer than Galaxy A20, it's heavier and thicker. Motorola One 5G features a more vivid screen than Galaxy A20, because it has a way better 1080 x 2520px resolution, a bit bigger display and a lot greater pixel number per display inch.
Motorola One 5G counts with a way bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A20, because it has more internal memory capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. The Motorola One 5G counts with just a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A20, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Motorola One 5G also has a greater amount of RAM.
Motorola One 5G takes way better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A20, because it has a much bigger sensor shooting much better quality photos and videos, a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a larger camera aperture for better photography and video in poorly lited situations and a back-facing camera with a much higher 48 megapixels resolution.
Motorola One 5G has longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy A20, because it has a 25 percent larger battery capacity.
Although Motorola One 5G is a better device, it is way more expensive than Samsung Galaxy A20, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Samsung Galaxy A20. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy A20, letting go a few features and specs, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.