Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-04-10 | 2021-01-14 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Black,Deep blue and Red | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| $ 166.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LTPS |
| 268 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One 5G Ace is just a bit better than the Galaxy A20, with a general score of 81.6 against 74.7. Although Motorola One 5G Ace is newer than Galaxy A20, it's much thicker and a lot heavier. Motorola One 5G Ace features a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A20, because it has a quite larger screen, a much higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a higher display pixel density.
Motorola One 5G Ace has a little faster processing unit than Galaxy A20, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Motorola One 5G Ace also has a higher amount of RAM. Motorola One 5G Ace takes a lot better videos and photos than Galaxy A20, because it has a lot higher video resolution, a bigger aperture for better captures and video in low-light environments and a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution.
The Motorola One 5G Ace counts with a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A20, because it has an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB and more internal storage. The Motorola One 5G Ace features greater battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A20, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Although Motorola One 5G Ace is a better device, it is way more expensive than Galaxy A20, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Galaxy A20. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get Galaxy A20, giving up some specs and features, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.