Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-04-10 | 2019-08-16 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black,Deep blue and Red | Denim blue and Pearl white |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| $ 166.00 | $ 304.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 268 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Action is slightly better than the Galaxy A20, having a score of 78.5 against 74.7. The Motorola One Action is a just a little heavier and somewhat thicker phone than the Galaxy A20. Motorola One Action counts with a little faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A20, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola One Action also has 1 GB more RAM memory.
The Motorola One Action features a better screen than Galaxy A20, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a lot better screen density and a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2520. Motorola One Action counts with a much better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A20, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1000 GB and more internal storage capacity.
The Motorola One Action features a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A20, because although it has a lower 12 megapixels resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a larger aperture and a lot higher 3840x2160 video definition. Galaxy A20 features a little longer battery duration than Motorola One Action, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 3500mAh.
Although Motorola One Action is a better device, it is way more expensive than Galaxy A20, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Galaxy A20. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy Motorola One Action, but if you don't you can save some dollars and get the Galaxy A20, giving up a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.