Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-04-10 | 2019-12-04 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black,Deep blue and Red | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| $ 166.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 268 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Hyper has an overall score of 79.8, which is slightly better than the Galaxy A20's 74.7 score. Both phones we compare here use the same Android 11 OS, so they should provide you all the same OS features. Despite being the best cellphone in our current comparison, the Motorola One Hyper body is somewhat heavier and thicker than Galaxy A20.
Motorola One Hyper counts with a little better performance than Galaxy A20, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Motorola One Hyper also has a larger amount of RAM. The Motorola One Hyper has a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A20, because it has a better display pixel density, a little bigger screen and a lot better 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution.
Motorola One Hyper shoots greater pictures and videos than Galaxy A20, and although they both have a F1.9 camera aperture, the Motorola One Hyper also has a much higher 64 mega pixels resolution camera and a much better video resolution. The Motorola One Hyper features much more storage to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A20, because it has a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The Motorola One Hyper's battery life is just as good as the battery life in Samsung Galaxy A20.
Although Motorola One Hyper is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Galaxy A20, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Galaxy A20. So if you want that extra features, you can buy Motorola One Hyper, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the Galaxy A20, resigning some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.