Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-04-10 | 2019-09-05 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black,Deep blue and Red | Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 166.00 | $ 450.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Zoom is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy A20, having an 80 score against 74.7. Although the Motorola One Zoom is better than Samsung Galaxy A20, it must be told that it is also somewhat thicker and heavier. Motorola One Zoom features a sharper screen than Galaxy A20, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Motorola One Zoom also has a lot greater pixel density and a way better resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels.
Motorola One Zoom counts with a much greater memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy A20, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 128 GB against 512 GB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. The Motorola One Zoom features a bit better processing power than Galaxy A20, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Motorola One Zoom also has a larger amount of RAM.
Motorola One Zoom shoots a lot better videos and photos than Galaxy A20, because it has a bigger diafragm aperture for better low light photography and video, a way higher (4K) video definition, a much larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a back camera with a lot better 48 mega pixels resolution.
Galaxy A20 and Motorola One Zoom both feature similar battery performance.
Although Motorola One Zoom is a better device, it is way more expensive than Samsung Galaxy A20, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Samsung Galaxy A20. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy Motorola One Zoom, else you can save some money and buy the Samsung Galaxy A20, resigning some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.