Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-04-10 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black,Deep blue and Red | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| $ 166.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) has a score of 87, which is much better than the Galaxy A20's overall score of 74.7. These devices have the same Android 11 OS. Motorola razr (2020)'s construction has the same thickness than Galaxy A20, but it's somewhat heavier. Motorola razr (2020) features just a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A20, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Motorola razr (2020) counts with a slightly better display than Galaxy A20, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better screen pixel density and a better 876 x 2142 resolution. The Motorola razr (2020) features a very superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A20, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
The Galaxy A20 counts with a really longer battery duration than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 2800mAh. Motorola razr (2020) shoots a lot better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A20, because it has a much bigger sensor providing a much better image quality, a larger diafragm aperture, a much more megapixels back camera and a way better video resolution.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Galaxy A20, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Galaxy A20. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the Motorola razr (2020), otherwise you can save some dollars and buy the Galaxy A20, resigning some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.