Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 15 |
| 2019-04-10 | 2025-04-24 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black,Deep blue and Red | -- |
| Plastic | -- |
| $ 166.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | -- |
| Super AMOLED | LTPO |
| 268 pixels per inch | -- |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) is a little bit better than Galaxy A20, having a 79.2 score against 74.7. Although the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) is somewhat heavier than the Galaxy A20, it's way thinner and incredibly newer. These devices come with Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a more recent 15 version and Galaxy A20 has Android 11 version, so it provides some additional features and optimized performance.
Samsung Galaxy A20 has a much sharper display than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a little smaller display. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A20, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 480 GB more internal storage.
The Samsung Galaxy A20 has a lot better hardware performance than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has 13 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 cores. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) captures greater photographs and videos than Galaxy A20, because it has a back camera with lot more megapixels, a much better 7680x4320 video quality and a larger diafragm aperture to capture better captures and video in low-light environments.
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with greater battery duration than Galaxy A20, because it has a 4700mAh battery size instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.