Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-04-10 | 2019-03-03 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Black,Deep blue and Red | Blue |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 166.00 | $ 699.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.02 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Nokia 9 PureView has a global score of 76.4, which is a little bit better than Galaxy A20's general score of 74.7. The Nokia 9 PureView is a a little heavier device than the Galaxy A20, but they are 0.31inches thick. The Nokia 9 PureView has a bit better processor than Galaxy A20, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Nokia 9 PureView also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Nokia 9 PureView counts with a lot better display than Galaxy A20, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a lot more pixels per inch in the display and a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels. The Nokia 9 PureView has just a bit more storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A20, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage.
The Nokia 9 PureView has a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A20, because although it has a back-facing camera with lesser mega pixels, it also counts with a bigger aperture to capture better photos in low light situations, a bigger sensor capturing higher quality videos and pictures and a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
Galaxy A20 counts with better battery duration than Nokia 9 PureView, because it has a 20% greater battery size.
Although Nokia 9 PureView is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Samsung Galaxy A20, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Samsung Galaxy A20. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can get Samsung Galaxy A20, letting go a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.