Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 80.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-04-10 | 2021-07-29 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Black,Deep blue and Red | Granite Gre and Ultra Blue |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 166.00 | $ 550.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | -- |
| 268 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.02 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4630mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Nokia XR20 is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy A20, getting an 80.8 score against 74.7. Both of these phones use the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't notice any differences in that aspect. Even though Nokia XR20 is way newer than the Samsung Galaxy A20, it is way thicker and much heavier.
Nokia XR20 features a much better display than Samsung Galaxy A20, because it has a better pixels amount per display inch, a quite bigger screen and a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. The Nokia XR20 has a much better storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy A20, and although they both have an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB, the Nokia XR20 also has more internal memory capacity.
The Nokia XR20 features a bit more powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy A20, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Nokia XR20 also has 3 GB more RAM memory. Nokia XR20 shoots a lot better pictures and videos than Galaxy A20, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality, the Nokia XR20 also has a larger aperture, a much more MP camera in the back, better video frame rates and a much larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Nokia XR20 features just a little bit longer battery life than Galaxy A20, because it has a 4630mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Although Nokia XR20 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy A20, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Samsung Galaxy A20. If you want to save some dollars, you can get Samsung Galaxy A20, giving up a few features and specs, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.