Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-04-10 | 2024-03-11 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black,Deep blue and Red | -- |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 166.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.02 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has a score of 79.4, which is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A20's 74.7 score. The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G construction is a lot newer than Samsung Galaxy A20's, although it is just a little bit thicker and heavier. Both of these phones include Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has 14 version while Samsung Galaxy A20 has Android 11 version.
Galaxy A35 5G has a better looking screen than Galaxy A20, because it has a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px, more pixels per inch of screen and a quite larger screen. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G features just a bit bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A20, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A20 has a very superior performance than Galaxy A35 5G, although it has 3 GB less RAM, they both have 8 processing cores. Galaxy A35 5G takes way better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A20, because it has a bigger camera aperture to capture better low light photography, a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a camera in the back with a lot higher resolution and a way bigger sensor.
Galaxy A35 5G has superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy A20, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.