Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-04-10 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black,Deep blue and Red | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 166.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A70 has a score of 76.9, which is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy A20's global score of 74.7. Both phones in this review use Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A70 has the previous 10 version and Samsung Galaxy A20 has Android 11. Galaxy A70 is a a little bit heavier device than Samsung Galaxy A20, but both of them are 0.31inches thick.
The Galaxy A70 counts with a much better looking screen than Galaxy A20, because it has more pixels per display inch, a bit larger display and a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px. The Galaxy A70 features a lot bigger memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy A20, and although they both have an external memory slot that admits up to 512 GB, the Galaxy A70 also has more internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy A70 features a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A20, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy A70 also has 3 GB more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy A70 has a bit superior battery lifetime than Galaxy A20, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. The Galaxy A20 counts with a lot better camera than Galaxy A70, although it has a tinier back-facing camera sensor which gives a lower image and video quality and a tinier camera aperture, they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same (Full HD) video definition.
Although Galaxy A70 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy A20, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Samsung Galaxy A20. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy Galaxy A70, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and get the Samsung Galaxy A20, giving up a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.