Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-04-10 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black,Deep blue and Red | Prism bricks black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 166.00 | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 268 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G UW has a general score of 92.9, which is way better than the Galaxy A20's score of 74.7. These phones include Android OS, but the Galaxy A71 5G UW has 10 version while Galaxy A20 has Android 11. The Galaxy A71 5G UW design is newer, but a bit thicker and somewhat heavier than Galaxy A20.
Galaxy A71 5G UW has a sharper display than Galaxy A20, because it has a higher pixels density, a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a bit larger screen. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW features a much bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A20, because it has more internal storage and a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW features a bit better CPU than Samsung Galaxy A20, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a greater amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a little better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A20, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW shoots much better pictures and videos than Galaxy A20, because it has a bigger aperture for better photos and video in poorly lited environments, a much higher video definition, a way bigger sensor and a way more megapixels back facing camera.
Although Galaxy A71 5G UW is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy A20, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Samsung Galaxy A20. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get Samsung Galaxy A20, letting go a couple features and specs, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.