Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-04-10 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Black,Deep blue and Red | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Plastic | -- |
| $ 166.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Fold is way better than Samsung Galaxy A20, with a 97.6 score against 74.7. Both of these phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy Fold has the newer 9.0 Pie version and Samsung Galaxy A20 has Android 11, providing the user lots of additional features. Samsung Galaxy Fold's design is somewhat thinner but noticeably heavier than the Samsung Galaxy A20, and they were released only a few months apart.
Samsung Galaxy Fold features a more vivid screen than Galaxy A20, because it has a much better 1536 x 2152 pixels resolution, a little bit larger display and a greater pixel density. Samsung Galaxy Fold has a much bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy A20, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 480 GB more internal memory.
The Galaxy Fold has a bit better performance than Galaxy A20, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy Fold also has 9 GB more RAM. Samsung Galaxy Fold features a bit better battery life than Samsung Galaxy A20, because it has 4380mAh of battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy Fold captures much better pictures and videos than Galaxy A20, because although it has a back-facing camera with a lower resolution, it also counts with a much larger diafragm aperture, a lot better 3840x2160 video definition and a bigger back camera sensor providing a higher image quality.
Although Galaxy Fold is a better device, it costs a lot more than Galaxy A20, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Galaxy A20. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy Galaxy Fold, but if you don't you can save some dollars and get the Galaxy A20, letting go a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.