Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-04-10 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black,Deep blue and Red | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 166.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 268 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is way better than the Galaxy A20, having a general score of 90.8 against 74.7. Samsung Galaxy Note 20's construction is newer, but just a bit thicker and somewhat heavier than the Galaxy A20. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has just a bit better performance than Galaxy A20, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 also has more RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a sharper display than Galaxy A20, because it has a little bigger screen, more pixels per inch of display and a lot better 1080 x 2400 resolution. Galaxy Note 20 takes much better pictures and videos than Galaxy A20, because although it has a worse 12 megapixels resolution back camera, it also counts with a lot better 7680x4320 video quality, a bigger aperture to take better low light photos and video and a much bigger camera sensor.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 features just a bit more storage to install applications and games than Galaxy A20, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A20, because it has a 4300mAh battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Note 20 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Samsung Galaxy A20, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Samsung Galaxy A20. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy Galaxy Note 20, but if you don't you can save some dollars and get the Samsung Galaxy A20, letting go some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.