Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2019-04-10 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black,Deep blue and Red | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 166.00 | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 3 is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A20, with a general score of 81.2 against 74.7. Even though the Galaxy Note 3 is older and a bit thicker than the Samsung Galaxy A20, it's design is still just a little lighter. These phones include Android operating system, but Galaxy Note 3 has the older 5.0 version and Samsung Galaxy A20 has Android 11 version.
Galaxy Note 3 counts with a bit superior CPU than Galaxy A20, because although it has 4 lesser cpu cores , and they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Galaxy Note 3 also counts with a graphics processing unit. Galaxy Note 3 counts with a way better looking display than Galaxy A20, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1920 x 1080px and a better pixels density.
The Galaxy Note 3 shoots clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy A20, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have a same resolution camera in the back, the Galaxy Note 3 also counts with a bigger camera sensor providing a higher image quality and a way higher video resolution. Samsung Galaxy A20 counts with just a bit bigger storage to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
The Galaxy A20 has improved battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 3, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy Note 3 is a lot more expensive than the Galaxy A20, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.