Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-04-10 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black,Deep blue and Red | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 166.00 | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.02 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note Fan Edition is a little bit better than Galaxy A20, getting a overall score of 80.4 against 74.7. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition is a a bit lighter cellphone than Galaxy A20, but both are 0.31inches thick. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with a brighter display than Samsung Galaxy A20, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a way better pixel quantity per screen inch and a lot better resolution of 1440 x 2560.
Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition features just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A20, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition also has 1 GB more RAM. Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition shoots just a bit better videos and photos than Galaxy A20, because although it has a camera in the back with a lower 12 mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture, a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a larger sensor which gives a higher photo and video quality.
Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with just a bit bigger memory to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A20, because although it has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 256 GB against 512 GB, it also counts with 64 GB internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy A20 features superior battery performance than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Galaxy A20, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Galaxy A20. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the Galaxy A20, giving up some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.