Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2019-04-10 | 2013-09-25 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black,Deep blue and Red | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 166.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 330 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note3 is a bit better than the Galaxy A20, with a 77.7 score against 74.7. Both of these phones come with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy Note3 has a more recent 4.4.2 version and Galaxy A20 has Android 11. The Samsung Galaxy Note3 construction is just a little bit lighter than the Galaxy A20, although it's just a bit thicker and was released many years before.
The Samsung Galaxy Note3 counts with a bit superior processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A20, although it has a lower number of cores (although faster), they both have the same RAM amount. The Galaxy Note3 features a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A20, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels and a higher pixel number per inch of screen.
The Galaxy A20 features just a bit more memory to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because although it has just 32 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy Note3 counts with just a bit better camera than Galaxy A20, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for low light images and videos, and they both have the same resolution back camera, the Samsung Galaxy Note3 also counts with a bigger sensor capturing higher quality photographs and a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
The Samsung Galaxy A20 features greater battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.