Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-04-10 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Black,Deep blue and Red | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 166.00 | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10e is much better than the Galaxy A20, getting a general score of 86.3 against 74.7. Galaxy S10e's body has the same thickness than the Galaxy A20, but it is somewhat lighter. The Galaxy S10e counts with a much better looking display than Galaxy A20, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a way better resolution of 1080 x 2280 and much more pixels per inch of display.
The Samsung Galaxy S10e features a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy A20, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy S10e also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Galaxy S10e has a superior camera than Galaxy A20, because although it has a less MP back-facing camera, it also counts with a bigger sensor which gives a higher photo and video quality, a much better video resolution and a way bigger aperture.
Galaxy S10e has a superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A20, and although they both have a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB, the Galaxy S10e also has more internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy A20 has superior battery life than Galaxy S10e, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Galaxy S10e is a better device, it is way more expensive than Galaxy A20, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Galaxy A20. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get Galaxy A20, letting go a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.