Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-04-10 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Black,Deep blue and Red | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 166.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 is way better than Galaxy A20, with a 94.8 score against 74.7. The Galaxy S20 is a just a bit lighter device than the Galaxy A20, but both of them are equally thin. Both phones in this review work with Android OS, but Galaxy S20 has a newer 13 version while Galaxy A20 has Android 11, so it gives you a couple additional features and increased performance.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 has a much better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A20, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 3200px and a much higher pixel count per inch of screen. Galaxy S20 features a much greater memory for games and applications than Galaxy A20, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1000 GB.
Galaxy S20 has a bit faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy A20, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy S20 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy S20 shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A20, because although it has a less mega pixels resolution camera, it also counts with a lot bigger sensor providing a lot better image quality, a much higher 7680x4320 video quality and a bigger aperture to capture better captures in poorly lited situations.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 features a battery performance that's very similar to Samsung Galaxy A20's battery life.
Although Samsung Galaxy S20 is a better device, it is way more expensive than Samsung Galaxy A20, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Samsung Galaxy A20. If you want to save some money, you can get the Samsung Galaxy A20, and give up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.