Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-04-10 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Black,Deep blue and Red | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 166.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is much better than Galaxy A20, having a 98 score against 74.7. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G construction is newer than Galaxy A20's, although it is somewhat thicker and much heavier. These devices use Android operating system, but the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has newer 13 version while Galaxy A20 has Android 11 version, giving some additional features.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a bit faster processor than Samsung Galaxy A20, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has 9 GB more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a much more vibrant screen than Samsung Galaxy A20, because it has a little bigger screen, a much better 1440 x 3200 resolution and a way higher display pixel density.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a much greater storage for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A20, because it has a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1000 GB and more internal storage. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a very superior camera than Galaxy A20, because it has a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a way bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a way higher image quality, a larger diafragm aperture for better photos and videos in poorly lited situations and a way more mega pixels back-facing camera.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has better battery life than Samsung Galaxy A20, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Although Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Samsung Galaxy A20, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Samsung Galaxy A20. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy A20, giving up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.