Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 13, 12 |
| 2019-04-10 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black,Deep blue and Red | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 166.00 | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 is way better than Galaxy A20, getting a 93.4 score against 74.7. Samsung Galaxy S22's construction is noticeably newer, just a little bit thinner and a bit lighter than Galaxy A20. Both of these devices use Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy S22 has a newer 13 version and Galaxy A20 has Android 11 version, so it provides the user some nice extra features.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 counts with a lot better looking display than Galaxy A20, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a much better pixels quantity per inch of screen and a way higher 1080 x 2340 resolution. The Galaxy S22 has just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A20, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S22 also has 5 GB more RAM.
The Galaxy S22 counts with slightly more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A20, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. The Galaxy S22 captures much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy A20, because it has a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a way more megapixels back camera, a bigger aperture to capture better low-light photography and videos and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor taking way higher quality videos and photographs.
Samsung Galaxy A20 features a bit superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S22, because it has an 8 percent greater battery capacity.
Although Galaxy S22 is a better device, it costs a lot more than Galaxy A20, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Galaxy A20. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get Galaxy A20, giving up a few specs and features, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.