Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-04-10 | -- |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 5.96 ounces | -- |
| Black,Deep blue and Red | -- |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 166.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S25 is much better than Galaxy A20, getting an 82.6 score against 74.7. Samsung Galaxy S25's design is noticeably lighter and a lot thinner than the Galaxy A20. Both of these devices come with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy S25 has newer 14 version while Galaxy A20 has Android 11 version, so it provides a couple additional features and performance tweaks.
Samsung Galaxy A20 has a very superior hardware performance than Galaxy S25, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy S25 has a lot better looking screen than Galaxy A20, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher 1080 x 2340px resolution and a lot more pixels per inch of screen.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 captures much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A20, because it has a much better 7680x4320 video resolution, a larger diafragm aperture, a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting way higher quality videos and photographs and a way more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy S25 features a slightly better storage to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A20, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. Samsung Galaxy A20 and Galaxy S25 both feature similar batteries performance.
Although Galaxy S25 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy A20, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Samsung Galaxy A20. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the Galaxy S25, otherwise you can save some dollars and buy the Samsung Galaxy A20, giving up some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.