Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-04-10 | -- |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 5.96 ounces | -- |
| Black,Deep blue and Red | -- |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 166.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a global score of 90.7, which is much better than the Galaxy A20's 74.7 score. These phones come with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has the newer 14 version while Galaxy A20 has Android 11 version. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a extremely thinner and way lighter device than the Galaxy A20.
Galaxy S25 Ultra has a way better looking display than Galaxy A20, because it has a way better 1440 x 3088 resolution, a way better amount of pixels per inch of screen and a little bigger display. Samsung Galaxy A20 counts with a much powerful CPU than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has lesser RAM, they both have 8 cores.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra takes much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy A20, because it has a camera in the back with lot more MP, a way bigger back camera sensor shooting way higher quality videos and photos, a bigger aperture to capture better low-light photos and video and a much better video quality.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a much greater storage for apps and games than Galaxy A20, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with improved battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A20, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.