Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2019-04-10 | 2014-06-23 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black,Deep blue and Red | Blue and Red |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 166.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.02 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 6.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S5 Sport is slightly better than the Galaxy A20, getting a overall score of 77.8 against 74.7. These phones come with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S5 Sport has newer 4.4.2 version and Galaxy A20 has Android 11 version. Even though the Galaxy S5 Sport is notably older and thicker than Galaxy A20, it's body is still a little bit lighter.
The Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport counts with a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy A20, because although it has 4 lesser cpu cores (but faster) and 1 GB lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a graphics processing unit. The Galaxy S5 Sport counts with an incredibly better display than Galaxy A20, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1920 x 1080px and a much greater display density.
The Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport counts with a slightly better camera than Galaxy A20, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, it also counts with a way better 3840x2160 video definition, a bigger sensor capturing higher quality videos and photos and a better 16 MP resolution back-facing camera.
Galaxy A20 has a very superior memory for applications and games than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has 32 GB internal storage capacity and an external memory card slot that supports up to 512 GB. Galaxy A20 counts with a very superior battery performance than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Although Galaxy S5 Sport is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Galaxy A20, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Galaxy A20. If you prefer to save some money, you can get the Galaxy A20, and give up a few features and specs, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.