Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-04-10 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black,Deep blue and Red | Black |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 166.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 268 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is slightly better than Galaxy A20, with an 81 score against 74.7. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro design is newer than Galaxy A20's, but it's extremely thicker and noticeably heavier. Both of these phones work with the same Android 11 OS (Operating System). The Galaxy XCover Pro features a brighter screen than Samsung Galaxy A20, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a much higher pixel density and a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2340.
Galaxy XCover Pro has a bit faster processor than Galaxy A20, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy XCover Pro also has more RAM memory. The Galaxy XCover Pro features a bit better camera than Galaxy A20, because although it has a lot smaller sensor taking less light and washed colors, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution, the Galaxy XCover Pro also counts with a camera with lot more mega pixels and a larger camera aperture to take better low light photography and videos.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features a bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy A20, and although they both have an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro also has more internal memory. Galaxy XCover Pro features just a little better battery lifetime than Galaxy A20, because it has a 4050mAh battery size against 4000mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy A20, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Samsung Galaxy A20. If you want to save some money, you can buy Samsung Galaxy A20, and give up a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.