Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-04-10 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black,Deep blue and Red | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| $ 166.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a general score of 88.5, which is much better than the Samsung Galaxy A20's 74.7 general score. Both of these devices work with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has the newer 12 version and Samsung Galaxy A20 has Android 11. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip body is newer and just a little thinner, but also a little heavier than Samsung Galaxy A20.
Galaxy Z Flip has a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A20, because it has a way higher pixels density, a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2636px and a little bit larger screen. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A20, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 224 GB more internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy Z Flip counts with a bit superior CPU than Galaxy A20, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Z Flip also has 5 GB more RAM. The Galaxy A20 counts with improved battery performance than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity. Galaxy Z Flip has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy A20, because although it has a camera with a worse 12 MP resolution, it also counts with a way better video quality, a larger back-facing camera sensor shooting higher quality videos and photos and a bigger aperture to take better low-light captures and videos.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Samsung Galaxy A20, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Samsung Galaxy A20. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy A20, and give up some specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.