Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-04-10 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black,Deep blue and Red | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| $ 166.00 | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a lot better than Samsung Galaxy A20, with a 92.3 score against 74.7. Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a little heavier than the Samsung Galaxy A20, it's just a bit thinner and newer. Both of these phones have the same Android 11 operating system, so they should provide the user identical OS features.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a better looking screen than Galaxy A20, because it has a lot higher 1080 x 2636 resolution, a way better pixel amount per inch in the display and a little larger screen. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a very superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A20, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a quite superior processing power than Galaxy A20, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a larger amount of RAM. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G takes much better photos and videos than Galaxy A20, because although it has a back facing camera with a lower 12 mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger back camera sensor capturing better quality photos, a larger camera aperture and a way better (4K) video quality.
The Galaxy A20 counts with longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a better device, it is way more expensive than Galaxy A20, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Galaxy A20. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy Galaxy A20, and give up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.