Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-04-10 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Black,Deep blue and Red | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| $ 166.00 | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a lot better than the Samsung Galaxy A20, having a 94.6 score against 74.7. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a newer and thinner phone than the Samsung Galaxy A20, although it is way heavier. Both phones in this comparison work with the same Android 11 OS (operating system). The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a superior CPU than Galaxy A20, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has more RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A20, because it has a bigger display, a way better resolution of 1768 x 2208 pixels and more pixels per inch of display. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 takes much better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A20, because although it has a back-facing camera with a lower resolution, it also counts with a larger camera aperture to take better captures and videos in low light situations, a lot better (4K) video resolution and a way larger back-facing camera sensor capturing way higher quality photos and videos.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a much better memory for apps and games than Galaxy A20, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with just a little better battery performance than Galaxy A20, because it has a 13% larger battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Galaxy A20, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Galaxy A20. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, else you can save some money and get the Galaxy A20, resigning some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.