Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-04-10 | 2017-04-05 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.68 ounces |
| Black,Deep blue and Red | Black, Blue and Silver |
| Plastic | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 166.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 268 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.02 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xperia XZs is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A20, getting a 77.2 score against 74.7. The Xperia XZs design is just a little lighter than Samsung Galaxy A20, but it's just a little thicker and was released 2 years before. Sony Xperia XZs counts with a bit better processor than Samsung Galaxy A20, because although it has a lower number of cores , it also counts with a higher amount of RAM.
Xperia XZs features a better display than Galaxy A20, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels and a way greater screen pixel density. The Galaxy A20 has a better memory for apps and games than Xperia XZs, and although they both have the same 32 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A20 also has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
Xperia XZs shoots a lot better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A20, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low-light captures and videos, it also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a much larger sensor providing a lot better image quality and a way more megapixels camera in the back.
Samsung Galaxy A20 counts with a really longer battery duration than Xperia XZs, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Sony Xperia XZs is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Galaxy A20, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Galaxy A20. So if you need that extra features, you can buy Sony Xperia XZs, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the Galaxy A20, resigning a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.