Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 5.1 |
| 2019-04-10 | 2015-06-16 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 5.69 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.64 ounces |
| Black,Deep blue and Red | Black and White |
| Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 166.00 | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 268 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xperia Z4v is slightly better than Galaxy A20, having a 78.8 score against 74.7. The Xperia Z4v construction is a bit lighter than Galaxy A20, although it is just a little thicker and was released 4 years before. Both phones in this comparison review include Android OS, but Xperia Z4v has an older 5.1 version while Galaxy A20 has Android 11.
The Sony Xperia Z4v features a bit better processor than Samsung Galaxy A20, and although they both have 3 GB of RAM and 8 cores, the Sony Xperia Z4v also has an extra graphics co-processor. The Xperia Z4v counts with an incredibly better looking display than Galaxy A20, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher 2560 x 1440 resolution and a way higher screen density.
The Xperia Z4v counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy A20, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low light captures and video, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 video quality, a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution and a way larger sensor which offers a way higher photo and video quality.
Galaxy A20 has a superior memory capacity for applications and games than Sony Xperia Z4v, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Galaxy A20 also has a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy A20 has longer battery performance than Xperia Z4v, because it has a 33 percent larger battery size.
Although Xperia Z4v is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Galaxy A20, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Galaxy A20. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the Xperia Z4v, else you can save some dollars and get the Galaxy A20, resigning a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.