Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 81.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-04-10 | 2019-04-15 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 5.81 x 2.78 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Black,Deep blue and Red | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 166.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 SDM712 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 616 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3070mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE is slightly better than Galaxy A20, having an 81.4 score against 74.7. Both phones in this comparison include Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has newer 9.0 Pie version while Galaxy A20 has Android 11. Even when the Xiaomi Mi 9 SE and Galaxy A20 were only released with a couple months difference, the Xiaomi Mi 9 SE is a little bit thinner and just a bit lighter.
The Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy A20, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Xiaomi Mi 9 SE also has more RAM memory. Xiaomi Mi 9 SE features a way better display than Galaxy A20, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher 1080 x 2340 resolution and a lot more pixels per inch of display.
The Xiaomi Mi 9 SE features just a bit bigger memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A20, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy A20 counts with greater battery duration than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Mi 9 SE features a very superior camera than Galaxy A20, because it has a back facing camera with a way better 48 mega pixels resolution, a larger diafragm aperture, a much bigger sensor and a lot better (4K) video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.