Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-04-10 | 2018-04-03 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black,Deep blue and Red | Black and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 166.00 | $ 639.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 268 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is better than the Galaxy A20, having a general score of 83.8 against 74.7. Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is an older, a little bit thicker and heavier cellphone than Galaxy A20. Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has a more vivid screen than Galaxy A20, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2160px and a greater display density.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s counts with a bit faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A20, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s features a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy A20, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s counts with just a bit better camera than Galaxy A20, because although it has a back camera with a worse resolution, it also counts with a bigger back-facing camera sensor which gives a better image and video quality, a larger camera aperture and a much higher video definition. Galaxy A20 features improved battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3400mAh.
Although Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Samsung Galaxy A20, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Samsung Galaxy A20. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get the Samsung Galaxy A20, letting go a few features and specifications, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.