Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-04-10 | 2018-11-01 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.22 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Black,Deep blue and Red | Black, Blue and Green |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| $ 166.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 has a general score of 83.8, which is better than the Galaxy A20's overall score of 74.7. Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 is a notably heavier and a little bit thicker phone than the Galaxy A20. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 has just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy A20, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 also has more RAM.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 counts with a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A20, and although they both have a same size screen, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 also has a lot more pixels per inch of screen and a way better resolution of 1080 x 2340. Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 takes much better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A20, because although it has a back facing camera with less megapixels resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture for better photos and video in low-light situations, a larger back camera sensor capturing higher quality photos and videos and a lot higher video quality.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 counts with a very superior memory to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A20, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 224 GB more internal memory. Galaxy A20 counts with greater battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.