Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.2 | 83 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 9.0 Pie | iOS 9.x |
| 2019-04-10 | 2015-09-09 |
| 5.80 x 2.74 x 0.33 inches | 5.44 x 2.64 x 0.28 inches |
| 4.97 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Plastic | Aluminium, Glass and Steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 575.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 750 x 1334 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 296 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Apple A9 APL0898 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | 64-bit Twister, 64-bit (Dual-Core 1840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 2 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | PowerVR GT7600 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 29.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.9 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 1715mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 240 hours standby time 14 hours talk time |
| 4.96 | 3.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 6s has an overall score of 83, which is better than Galaxy A20e's 74.2 overall score. The Apple iPhone 6s counts with iOS 9.x OS, and Galaxy A20e has Android 9.0 Pie OS. The Apple iPhone 6s design is somewhat thinner than Galaxy A20e, but it's just a little heavier and was released 4 years before.
The iPhone 6s has a superior CPU than Galaxy A20e, because although it has lesser RAM and a lower number of cores (although faster), it also counts with an extra GPU and a 64-bits CPU. IPhone 6s has an incredibly better screen than Galaxy A20e, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1334 x 750 pixels and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a little greater number of pixels in each display inch.
The iPhone 6s features a little bit more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A20e, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal memory. Galaxy A20e features a much better battery lifetime than Apple iPhone 6s, because it has a 3000mAh battery size.
The Apple iPhone 6s takes clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy A20e, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for shooting photographs and videos in low-light environments and a back-facing camera with lesser mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.