Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.2 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-04-10 | 2017-09-22 |
| 5.80 x 2.74 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 4.97 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 949.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 296 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 8.73 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 2691mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 8 Plus is much better than the Galaxy A20e, with an 87.1 score against 74.2. IPhone 8 Plus is an older and way heavier cellphone than the Galaxy A20e, but Apple was able to build it a little bit thinner anyway. Apple iPhone 8 Plus has a superior performance than Galaxy A20e, because although it has lesser CPU cores (but faster), and they both have 3 GB of RAM, the Apple iPhone 8 Plus also counts with a 64-bit processing unit.
The iPhone 8 Plus counts with a brighter screen than Galaxy A20e, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch of screen and a higher 1080 x 1920 pixels resolution. The iPhone 8 Plus takes much better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A20e, because although it has a lower 12 MP resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture to take better images and video in poorly lited environments and a lot higher 3840x2160 video definition.
The iPhone 8 Plus counts with much more storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A20e, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy A20e counts with just a bit better battery life than iPhone 8 Plus, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.