Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.2 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-04-10 | 2017-11-03 |
| 5.80 x 2.74 x 0.33 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 4.97 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 296 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 8.73 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone X is much better than the Galaxy A20e, having a overall score of 88.1 against 74.2. Despite of the fact the Apple iPhone X is older and heavier than Galaxy A20e, it's body is still a bit thinner. The iPhone X features a quite better performance than Samsung Galaxy A20e, because although it has a lower number of cores (but faster), and they both have 3 GB of RAM memory, the iPhone X also counts with a 64-bit processor.
IPhone X counts with a lot better screen than Galaxy A20e, and although they both have a display with the same size, the iPhone X also has a way better display pixels density and a way higher 1125 x 2436px resolution. The Apple iPhone X shoots much clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A20e, because although it has a camera in the back with a worse 12 MP resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture and a way better 3840x2160 video definition.
The Apple iPhone X counts with a very superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy A20e, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. The Galaxy A20e features just a bit better battery performance than iPhone X, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity against 2716mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.