Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.2 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-04-10 | 2018-10-26 |
| 5.80 x 2.74 x 0.33 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.97 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 296 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 8.73 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone XR is better than the Samsung Galaxy A20e, getting an 82 score against 74.2. Apple iPhone XR is a notably heavier phone than the Samsung Galaxy A20e, but both have the same thickness. The Apple iPhone XR features a brighter screen than Samsung Galaxy A20e, because it has a just a little better pixel count in each inch in the screen, a little bigger screen and a slightly better resolution of 828 x 1792px.
The iPhone XR counts with a superior processor than Galaxy A20e, because although it has a lower number of cores , and they both have the same RAM memory amount, the iPhone XR also counts with a 64 bits processor. The Galaxy A20e has a much bigger memory to install applications and games than iPhone XR, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 512 GB.
Galaxy A20e and iPhone XR both have incredibly similar battery performance, although the iPhone XR has just 2942mAh battery capacity. IPhone XR shoots much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy A20e, because although it has a lower 12 megapixels resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a lot higher video resolution and a bigger diafragm aperture for better low light images and video.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.