Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.2 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-04-10 | 2018-09-21 |
| 5.80 x 2.74 x 0.33 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 4.97 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 296 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 8.73 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone XS is better than Samsung Galaxy A20e, getting an 84.2 score against 74.2. Although Apple iPhone XS and the Samsung Galaxy A20e were released with only 7 months difference, Apple iPhone XS's construction is just a little thinner but incredibly heavier. The Apple iPhone XS counts with a more powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy A20e, because although it has 2 less cores , it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit and more RAM.
The Apple iPhone XS features an incredibly better display than Galaxy A20e, and although they both have a same size screen, the Apple iPhone XS also has much more pixels per inch of display and a much higher resolution of 1125 x 2436px. The iPhone XS has a better camera than Galaxy A20e, because although it has a less mega pixels camera, it also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a bigger aperture for better photos and video in low-light environments.
The Samsung Galaxy A20e features much more storage capacity for applications and games than Apple iPhone XS, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits up to 512 GB. The Galaxy A20e has a bit better battery performance than iPhone XS, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.