Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.2 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-04-10 | 2016-10-20 |
| 5.80 x 2.74 x 0.33 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 4.97 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Black, Gray and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 5 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| TFT | AMOLED |
| 296 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.73 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel has a global score of 80.2, which is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A20e's score of 74.2. Although it's the best device we are comparing, Google Pixel's construction is a lot older, just a little bit thicker and just a little heavier than Samsung Galaxy A20e. Google Pixel features a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy A20e, because although it has a lower number of cores (but faster), it also counts with a larger amount of RAM.
Google Pixel features a better looking screen than Galaxy A20e, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixels density and a higher resolution of 1080 x 1920. Google Pixel features slightly more memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy A20e, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage capacity.
Galaxy A20e counts with a bit longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity. The Google Pixel shoots just a bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A20e, because although it has a less mega pixels resolution camera in the back and a smaller diafragm aperture, it also counts with a way better video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.