Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.2 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-04-10 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.80 x 2.74 x 0.33 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.97 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 296 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 has a score of 80, which is just a bit better than Galaxy A20e's 74.2 score. Although Google Pixel 3 and Galaxy A20e were released with only a few months difference, Google Pixel 3's construction is a little bit heavier but a little thinner. Google Pixel 3 has a much better looking screen than Galaxy A20e, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a way better 1080 x 2160px resolution and more pixels per inch in the screen.
Google Pixel 3 counts with a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy A20e, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Google Pixel 3 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Galaxy A20e counts with a very superior storage to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 3, because although it has just 32 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds up to 512 GB.
Samsung Galaxy A20e counts with a little better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity. Google Pixel 3 features a bit better camera than Galaxy A20e, because although it has a lesser mega pixels back facing camera, it also counts with a lot better (4K) video quality and a larger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.