Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.2 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-04-10 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.80 x 2.74 x 0.33 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.97 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 296 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 XL is just a bit better than the Galaxy A20e, with a score of 80.7 against 74.2. Although the Google Pixel 3 XL and Galaxy A20e were only released 6 months apart, Google Pixel 3 XL's design is way heavier but just a little bit thinner than Galaxy A20e. Google Pixel 3 XL has a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy A20e, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Google Pixel 3 XL also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a brighter display than Galaxy A20e, because it has a little larger screen, a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 2960 and a way better pixels count per inch of display. Samsung Galaxy A20e has a much better storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
Google Pixel 3 XL features a bit better battery performance than Galaxy A20e, because it has 3430mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. The Google Pixel 3 XL takes a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy A20e, because although it has a back-facing camera with a lower 12.2 mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture to capture better low-light images and a lot higher 3840x2160 video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.